{
  "query": "NEC4 unknown unknown risk management best practices construction",
  "raw_results": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/nec-contracts-risk-management",
      "title": "NEC contracts—risk management | Legal Guidance | LexisNexis",
      "content": "The NEC3 and NEC4 contracts encourage an ongoing, proactive approach to the Monitoring and management of risks, and anyone administering or working under these contracts needs to pay close attention to the risk management processes. This Practice Note looks specifically at the risk management provisions in the NEC3/NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), but similar provisions are found across the suite.\n\n### Risk allocation\n\nFirst, a distinction must be drawn between risk management and risk allocation in the NEC contracts. [...] # NEC contracts—risk management\n\n##### Published by a LexisNexis Construction expert\n\n# NEC contracts—risk management\n\n#### Published by a LexisNexis Construction expert\n\nimgtext\n\nThe NEC3 and NEC4 contracts encourage an ongoing, proactive approach to the Monitoring and management of risks, and anyone administering or working under these contracts needs to pay close attention to the risk management processes. This Practice Note looks specifically at the risk management provisions in the NEC3/NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), but similar provisions are found across the suite.\n\n### Risk allocation\n\nFirst, a distinction must be drawn between risk management and risk allocation in the NEC contracts. [...] NEC contracts—interpreting the list of compensation events (clause 60)This Practice Note examines and provides commentary on the list of compensation events contained in clause 60 of the NEC3 and NEC4 engineering and construction contracts (NEC3 ECC and NEC4 ECC). It looks at how the different\n\nSocialLinkedIn\nSocialTwitter\nSocial_Youtube\nSocialInstagram\nSocialFacebook\nCONTACT US\n\n#### Call us on\n\n0330 161 1234\n\n### LEGAL SOLUTIONS\n\n### Popular Links\n\n### HELP & SUPPORT\n\n### Policies\n\nfooter lexisnexis logo\nReed Elsevier",
      "score": 0.6747586,
      "raw_content": null
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.planacademy.com/manage-unknowns-construction-projects/",
      "title": "How To Manage Unknowns In Your Construction Projects",
      "content": "### Managing an Unknown Unknown\n\nUnknown unknowns are unidentified risks that are not part of the project scope neither form part of the risk management plan. Unknown unknown happen not only because of situations that trigger these events haven’t been experience before but because the project team has not analyze or brainstorm enough about the possibilities and risks of unprecedented issues.\n\nI understand that some risks are time-dependent, others are progress-dependent while others are just residual risks after a risk has been mitigated. Events that are uncertain in nature and uncertain in consequences fall into this category and a more thorough analysis is needed. [...] ### Responding to a Known Unknown\n\nThe project management team can understand that contingency reserves are used to allocate money and reroutes to manage unknowns, in this case known unknowns. Contingency reserves are discussed with the project sponsor and must be documented in the risk registry and addressed in your risk management plan.\n\nThe known unknown must be identified, along with the even that will trigger the risk mitigation process. These types of risks are discussed early on during the project planning process and project sponsor and stakeholders confirm and validate the risk, contingency and response plan.\n\n### Managing an Unknown Unknown [...] An event must be analyzed in terms of impact, occurrence, consequence and likeliness for it to be considered as an unknown unknown. When all of these areas are not covered by any risk management plan. Then we must need to address the unknown unknown.\n\n### Addressing the Unknowns\n\nAs we have discussed there are two types of unknown. Contingency reserves will address known unknowns while management reserves are to take care of all other unknowns. The management reserve is only a discretionary quantity that is established at a corporate level or higher hierarchy allocated to address these unknown.",
      "score": 0.6320719,
      "raw_content": null
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.neccontract.com/getmedia/517c3d32-df47-4b53-b515-9faf3b377d5a/Richard-Patterson-Risk-Management-Paper.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqAqz2XUWdqOLidNUyNTdkrkr0jq4Mu14lJMG-akTWfzGRaTpwd",
      "title": "[PDF] NEC contracts provide an excellent basis for risk management, both ...",
      "content": "of risks that are risks that are with the contractor. This has no direct effect in the contract other than to assist in convincing the project manager that the programme is ‘realistic’ and so should not be ‘not accepted’ for being ‘unrealistic’ (Cl 31.3). 4.2 Risk registers and early warning It is good practice to consider risk management from the start of a project. If a formal risk management process in place, the client may operate some form of project risk log or register well before any construction Risk Management, Richard Patterson Page 13 of 16 contracts are let. This often sensibly shows the risks intended to be ‘retained by the client’ in the contract(s) used for the project. This risk log should inform the development of specific contracts for the project above. The client [...] Contract (ECC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Short Contract (ECSC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Subcontract (ESC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Short Subcontract (ECSC) • NEC Professional Services Contract (PSC) • NEC Professional Services Short Contract (PSSC) • NEC Term Service Contract (TSC) • NEC Term Service Short Contract (TSSC) • NEC Supply Contract (SC) • NEC Supply Short Contract (SCC) . NEC4 included also: • NEC Professional Services Subcontract (PSS) • NEC Design, Build and Operate Contract (DBOC) • The multi-party NEC Alliance Contract. The NEC’s approach to risk is explained in this paper by reference to the ECC. This is the member of the NEC family appropriate for implementation of a significant project and can include (any level of) design and construction. [...] sum’ contract. • Pass the efficiency risk to the contractor but retain the risk of the correctness of a bill of quantities - choose main Option B (priced contract with bill of quantities). • Retain the majority3 of quantities and efficiency risk and simply pay for the contractor’s resources to help achieve the client’s requirements – chose main Option E, Cost reimbursable contract. • Use a ‘target contract’ to: o share the quantity and efficiency risk – chose main option C, target contract with activity schedule or o share the efficiency risk but retain the risk of the quantities – choose main option D, target contract with bill of quantities. If the client chooses a target contract, it will also have to set appropriate ‘share percentages’ to define how to share the ‘pain’ of the",
      "score": 0.58465123,
      "raw_content": null
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.aclaimant.com/blog/systematic-risk-management-for-construction-projects",
      "title": "7 Systematic Approaches to Risk Management for Construction Projects",
      "content": "Plans may include physical controls (barriers, alarms, safety equipment), procedural updates (new checklists, modified workflows), training refreshers, or even contractual changes with subs or vendors.\n\nEvery mitigation step is tracked in the risk register and tied to a specific owner.\n\nBest practice: Regular review meetings, ideally as part of project stand-ups, check that mitigation plans are being executed.\n\nIf issues arise or conditions change (weather, regulation, supply delays), mitigation actions are adapted and documented immediately.\n\nFirms with robust mitigation plans experience fewer work stoppages and faster recovery from setbacks, because crews are always working from a current, consensus-based playbook.\n\n## 5. Proactive communication protocols [...] Each is grounded in best practices from global standards (such as ISO 31000, the Construction Industry Institute, and industry association guidance), with practical detail on how to implement them for today’s fast-paced, high-stakes jobsites.\n\n## 1. Risk identification workshops\n\nLaunching each project with a formal risk identification workshop sets the stage for everything that follows.\n\nThese sessions go far beyond a project manager’s checklist or a single team member’s experience.\n\nInstead, they assemble cross-disciplinary groups, field supervisors, safety officers, estimators, project engineers, and even key subcontractors, to pool insights on every conceivable risk.\n\nThe best workshops rely on structured prompts and historical data. [...] ## 7. Scenario planning and simulation\n\nNo risk management plan survives first contact with the real world without practice.\n\nScenario planning and simulation provide teams with a safe, controlled environment to test their readiness, identify weaknesses, and improve contingency planning.\n\nRegular “tabletop exercises” simulate events such as:\n\n Major safety incidents (falls, equipment failure)\n Severe weather or natural disasters\n Supply chain breakdowns or delayed materials\n Regulatory inspections or legal action\n\nParticipants walk through their responses, identify points of confusion or bottlenecks, and adjust both the risk register and mitigation plans accordingly.",
      "score": 0.55767727,
      "raw_content": null
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/design/dqab/dqab-repository/Risk%20Management%20for%20Project%20Development%20Guide_Final%20Draft_010514.pdf",
      "title": "[PDF] Appendix 15 – Risk Management for Project Development - nysdot",
      "content": "costs, promotes project goals, and ultimately aligns the construction team (agency, contractor, and consultants) with the needs and objectives of the traveling public. The objectives of risk allocation can vary depending on unique project goals, but four fundamental tenets of sound risk allocation should always be followed: 1. Allocate risks to the party best able manage them. 2. Allocate the risk in alignment with project goals. 3. Share risk when appropriate to accomplish project goals. 4. Ultimately seek to allocate risks to promote team alignment with customer-oriented performance goals. R Ri is sk k M Ma an na ag ge em me en nt t f fo or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t D De ev ve el lo op pm me en nt t - 47 - The rigorous process of risk identification, assessment, analysis, and mitigation [...] Successful Risk Management practices include the following major components: Awareness and Comprehension; Identification; Assessment and Analysis; Mitigation Planning; Allocation; Active Monitoring and Control. R Ri is sk k M Ma an na ag ge em me en nt t f fo or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t D De ev ve el lo op pm me en nt t - 12 -Risk management practice must begin during the development stages of an Initial Project Proposal (IPP) and continues throughout the completion of construction close-out. During IPP, the transportation problem identification and definition process occurs within the context of potential environmental and social issues and possible constraints. After all potential problems and issues have been adequately and satisfactorily explored, the proposed transportation project",
      "score": 0.41577685,
      "raw_content": null
    }
  ],
  "formatted": "Source: NEC contracts—risk management | Legal Guidance | LexisNexis\nURL: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/nec-contracts-risk-management\nThe NEC3 and NEC4 contracts encourage an ongoing, proactive approach to the Monitoring and management of risks, and anyone administering or working under these contracts needs to pay close attention to the risk management processes. This Practice Note looks specifically at the risk management provisions in the NEC3/NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), but similar provisions are found across the suite. ### Risk allocation First, a distinction must be drawn between risk management and risk allocation in the NEC contracts. [...] # NEC contracts—risk management ##### Published by a LexisNexis Construction expert # NEC contracts—risk management #### Published by a LexisNexis Construction expert imgtext The NEC3 and NEC4 contracts encourage an ongoing, proactive approach to the Monitoring and management of risks, and anyone administering or working under these contracts needs to pay close attention to the risk management processes. This Practice Note looks specifically at the risk management provisions in the NEC3/NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), but similar provisions are found across the suite. ### Risk allocation First, a distinction must be drawn between risk management and risk allocation in the NEC contracts. [...] NEC contracts—interpreting the list of compensation events (clause 60)This Practice Note examines and provides commentary on the list of compensation events contained in clause 60 of the NEC3 and NEC4 engineering and construction contracts (NEC3 ECC and NEC4 ECC). It looks at how the different SocialLinkedIn SocialTwitter Social_Youtube SocialInstagram SocialFacebook CONTACT US #### Call us on 0330 161 1234 ### LEGAL SOLUTIONS ### Popular Links ### HELP & SUPPORT ### Policies footer lexisnexis logo Reed Elsevier\n\n---\n\nSource: How To Manage Unknowns In Your Construction Projects\nURL: https://www.planacademy.com/manage-unknowns-construction-projects/\n### Managing an Unknown Unknown Unknown unknowns are unidentified risks that are not part of the project scope neither form part of the risk management plan. Unknown unknown happen not only because of situations that trigger these events haven’t been experience before but because the project team has not analyze or brainstorm enough about the possibilities and risks of unprecedented issues. I understand that some risks are time-dependent, others are progress-dependent while others are just residual risks after a risk has been mitigated. Events that are uncertain in nature and uncertain in consequences fall into this category and a more thorough analysis is needed. [...] ### Responding to a Known Unknown The project management team can understand that contingency reserves are used to allocate money and reroutes to manage unknowns, in this case known unknowns. Contingency reserves are discussed with the project sponsor and must be documented in the risk registry and addressed in your risk management plan. The known unknown must be identified, along with the even that will trigger the risk mitigation process. These types of risks are discussed early on during the project planning process and project sponsor and stakeholders confirm and validate the risk, contingency and response plan. ### Managing an Unknown Unknown [...] An event must be analyzed in terms of impact, occurrence, consequence and likeliness for it to be considered as an unknown unknown. When all of these areas are not covered by any risk management plan. Then we must need to address the unknown unknown. ### Addressing the Unknowns As we have discussed there are two types of unknown. Contingency reserves will address known unknowns while management reserves are to take care of all other unknowns. The manageme\n\n---\n\nSource: [PDF] NEC contracts provide an excellent basis for risk management, both ...\nURL: https://www.neccontract.com/getmedia/517c3d32-df47-4b53-b515-9faf3b377d5a/Richard-Patterson-Risk-Management-Paper.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqAqz2XUWdqOLidNUyNTdkrkr0jq4Mu14lJMG-akTWfzGRaTpwd\nof risks that are risks that are with the contractor. This has no direct effect in the contract other than to assist in convincing the project manager that the programme is ‘realistic’ and so should not be ‘not accepted’ for being ‘unrealistic’ (Cl 31.3). 4.2 Risk registers and early warning It is good practice to consider risk management from the start of a project. If a formal risk management process in place, the client may operate some form of project risk log or register well before any construction Risk Management, Richard Patterson Page 13 of 16 contracts are let. This often sensibly shows the risks intended to be ‘retained by the client’ in the contract(s) used for the project. This risk log should inform the development of specific contracts for the project above. The client [...] Contract (ECC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Short Contract (ECSC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Subcontract (ESC) • NEC Engineering and Construction Short Subcontract (ECSC) • NEC Professional Services Contract (PSC) • NEC Professional Services Short Contract (PSSC) • NEC Term Service Contract (TSC) • NEC Term Service Short Contract (TSSC) • NEC Supply Contract (SC) • NEC Supply Short Contract (SCC) . NEC4 included also: • NEC Professional Services Subcontract (PSS) • NEC Design, Build and Operate Contract (DBOC) • The multi-party NEC Alliance Contract. The NEC’s approach to risk is explained in this paper by reference to the ECC. This is the member of the NEC family appropriate for implementation of a significant project and can include (any level of) design and construction. [...] sum’ contract. • Pass the efficiency risk to the contractor but retain the risk of the correctness of a bill of quantities - choose main Option B (priced contract with bill of quantities). • Ret\n\n---\n\nSource: 7 Systematic Approaches to Risk Management for Construction Projects\nURL: https://www.aclaimant.com/blog/systematic-risk-management-for-construction-projects\nPlans may include physical controls (barriers, alarms, safety equipment), procedural updates (new checklists, modified workflows), training refreshers, or even contractual changes with subs or vendors. Every mitigation step is tracked in the risk register and tied to a specific owner. Best practice: Regular review meetings, ideally as part of project stand-ups, check that mitigation plans are being executed. If issues arise or conditions change (weather, regulation, supply delays), mitigation actions are adapted and documented immediately. Firms with robust mitigation plans experience fewer work stoppages and faster recovery from setbacks, because crews are always working from a current, consensus-based playbook. ## 5. Proactive communication protocols [...] Each is grounded in best practices from global standards (such as ISO 31000, the Construction Industry Institute, and industry association guidance), with practical detail on how to implement them for today’s fast-paced, high-stakes jobsites. ## 1. Risk identification workshops Launching each project with a formal risk identification workshop sets the stage for everything that follows. These sessions go far beyond a project manager’s checklist or a single team member’s experience. Instead, they assemble cross-disciplinary groups, field supervisors, safety officers, estimators, project engineers, and even key subcontractors, to pool insights on every conceivable risk. The best workshops rely on structured prompts and historical data. [...] ## 7. Scenario planning and simulation No risk management plan survives first contact with the real world without practice. Scenario planning and simulation provide teams with a safe, controlled environment to test their readiness, identify weaknesses, and improve contingency plann\n\n---\n\nSource: [PDF] Appendix 15 – Risk Management for Project Development - nysdot\nURL: https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/design/dqab/dqab-repository/Risk%20Management%20for%20Project%20Development%20Guide_Final%20Draft_010514.pdf\ncosts, promotes project goals, and ultimately aligns the construction team (agency, contractor, and consultants) with the needs and objectives of the traveling public. The objectives of risk allocation can vary depending on unique project goals, but four fundamental tenets of sound risk allocation should always be followed: 1. Allocate risks to the party best able manage them. 2. Allocate the risk in alignment with project goals. 3. Share risk when appropriate to accomplish project goals. 4. Ultimately seek to allocate risks to promote team alignment with customer-oriented performance goals. R Ri is sk k M Ma an na ag ge em me en nt t f fo or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t D De ev ve el lo op pm me en nt t - 47 - The rigorous process of risk identification, assessment, analysis, and mitigation [...] Successful Risk Management practices include the following major components: Awareness and Comprehension; Identification; Assessment and Analysis; Mitigation Planning; Allocation; Active Monitoring and Control. R Ri is sk k M Ma an na ag ge em me en nt t f fo or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t D De ev ve el lo op pm me en nt t - 12 -Risk management practice must begin during the development stages of an Initial Project Proposal (IPP) and continues throughout the completion of construction close-out. During IPP, the transportation problem identification and definition process occurs within the context of potential environmental and social issues and possible constraints. After all potential problems and issues have been adequately and satisfactorily explored, the proposed transportation project"
}